Non-Proliferation
Non Proliferation Funding Resource Center
START Resource Center
Since entering into force in 1970, the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the NPT, has remained the cornerstone of the international nonproliferation regime. In creating a system of mutual responsibilities and an international taboo against the use or threat to use nuclear weapons, the NPT has proven largely successful in stemming proliferation.
But the nonproliferation regime faces new challenges: insufficient protections against the theft or sale of various nuclear materials in states of the former Soviet Union; nuclear black market activity such as the network operated by A.Q. Khan out of Pakistan; threats by North Korea to share nuclear technology with states or non-state actors hostile to the U.S.; and, most recently, violations of IAEA nuclear safeguard standards by Iran, a signatory of the NPT which is pursuing technology for producing nuclear materials as part of a possible quest for a nuclear bomb.
The threat of nuclear terrorism is producing additional challenges to the NPT regime, particularly in the areas of securing and safeguarding nuclear weapons material, as is a pending agreement between the U.S. and India to share peaceful nuclear technology. The U.S.-India deal challenges the legitimacy of the NPT because it would not require India to join the NPT or to undertake any of the disarmament commitments that the P-5 agreed to.
Many experts agree that some type of nonproliferation regime reform is necessary, particularly since certain states have interpreted the NPT as allowing them to acquire nuclear technologies that take them to the brink of acquiring an actual nuclear weapon without explicitly violating the treaty, sometimes referred to as a "breakout capability." Withdrawing from the NPT also carries no penalty, save possible ad hoc action taken by the U.N. Security Council.
Jun 1, 2011 John Isaacs: Nuclear Arms Control Prospects
John Isaacs speaks at the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs on the prospects for nuclear arms control over the next 18 months.
Unless nuclear proliferation challenges are effectively addressed and until nuclear weapon states achieve further progress on their disarmament commitments, the future strength of the NPT regime remains in question.
ARTICLES & FACT SHEETS
Jan 11, 2012 UNSCR 1540 & the 2012 Nuclear Security Summit
Jan 6, 2012 Where Nuclear Safety and Security Meet
Apr 11, 2011 Nuclear Security Summit 1 Year Anniversary
Dec 20, 2010 Letter to the President on nuclear cooperation agreements
Aug 17, 2010 Is a “Region by Region” Approach Really Effective in Preventing the Spread of Sensitive Nuclear Technology?
Jul 15, 2010 The Right Strikes Out on START
Jun 1, 2010 John Isaacs Speaks in Malaysia
May 20, 2010 GOP Critics vs. the Pentagon
Apr 27, 2010 New START and the Obama Nuclear Agenda
Apr 25, 2010 New START Crucial for U.S. Security
Apr 5, 2010 Response to Hendrik Hertzberg
Mar 15, 2010 India and the NPT (Strategic Analysis)
Jan 27, 2010 Turning the Doomsday Clock
Dec 9, 2009 Fact Sheet: 2010 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference
Nov 12, 2009 For Safety, Ban Nuclear Tests
Nov 2, 2009 How to Ratify the Test Ban Treaty
Jul 15, 2009 Factsheet on the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty (FMCT)
Jun 22, 2009 Factsheet on the Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty
REPROCESSING RESOURCES
Dec 20, 2010 Letter to Congress on Laser Enrichment Facility in North Carolina
Oct 2, 2009 Letter to Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Laser Enrichment Facility in North Carolina
Oct 1, 2009 Fissile Materials Working Group: Policy Recommendations to President Obama
Oct 1, 2009 Fissile Materials Working Group: Cover Letter to President Obama
Aug 10, 2009 Policy Briefing on Nuclear Reprocessing: Is the U.S. Missing Out on the Nuclear Waste Solution?
Mar 20, 2009 The Global Nuclear Energy Partnership: Proliferation Concerns and Implications
Sep 2, 2008 Reprocessing: A Rapid Response Factsheet
Aug 19, 2008 The Future of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP): Next Steps
Aug 15, 2008 The Future of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP): Domestic Stakeholders
Aug 4, 2008 The Future of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP): The International Partners
Apr 30, 2008 Nuclear Fuel Recycling: More Trouble Than It's Worth
RESOURCES - FULL TEXTS
May 28, 2010 2010 NPT Review Conference Final Document
May 15, 1997 IAEA Additional Protocol to safeguards agreements
May 12, 1995 1995 Resolution On the Middle EAst
Apr 22, 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)
Mar 20, 2006 Nuclear Suppliers Group Guidelines
FY 2010 BUDGET ANALYSIS
Oct 21, 2009 Analysis of FY 2010 Defense Authorization Conference Agreement (HR 2647)
Jun 2, 2009 Obama Nuclear Nonproliferation Budget Disappointing
May 15, 2009 President Obama’s First Budget Shortchanges Nunn-Lugar
May 8, 2009 Analysis of the Fiscal Year 2010 Pentagon Spending Request: May "Full Request"
Feb 26, 2009 Fiscal Year 2010 Pentagon Defense Spending Request: February "Topline"
ADDITIONAL READING
- Congressional Research Service, "Managing the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Policy Implications of Expanding Global Access to Nuclear Power," updated March 7, 2008.
- Congressional Research Service, "India-U.S. Relations," updated August 12, 2008.
- Congressional Research Service, "Nonproliferation and Threat Reduction Assistance: U.S. Programs in the Former Soviet Union," updated January 3, 2008.
- Congressional Research Service, "Arms Control and Nonproliferation: A Catalog of Treaties and Agreements," updated April 9, 2008.